Overclocking Results

As expected the Threadripper CPUs were able to striking 4 GHz but unfortunately like Ryzen 7 weren't able to go beyond that betoken. Extreme voltages might meet you hit 4.i - 4.ii GHz like what we've seen with some Ryzen CPUs but for 24/seven usage four GHz looks to be the limit.

Anyway at 4 GHz the 1950X spat out an incredible score of 3408 pts in Cinebench though due to the fashion XFR works this overclock really slightly reduced the single thread performance. You could probably fine tune the overclock to avoid this but with time confronting united states we didn't play around with the overclocking too much.

Overclocked the Blender return fourth dimension for the 1950X was cutting downwards by an impressive 11% while the 1920X time was reduced past 6%. This ways even overclocked the Cadre i9-7900X wasn't much faster than the 1920X and wasn't able to lucifer the stock 1950X in this awarding.

Interestingly this fourth dimension when testing with Corona the 1920X saw a massive 17% performance improvement when overclocked while the 1950X was just seven% faster. This meant both overclocked Threadripper parts were much faster than the overclocked 7900X.

Dorsum to the kind of margins seen in Blender we find that while the 1950X was 9% faster overclocked the 1920X was just v% faster. This meant when testing with Premiere Pro CC the 1920X did trail the Cadre i9-7900X while the 1950X was quite a lot faster.

Overclocking functioning in Warhammer was tested using Uniform Memory Admission and here the overclocks did little to heave performance.

Finally we take the overclocking power consumption figures and hither Threadripper looks quite proficient, especially in relation to the Core i7-7900X. Whereas the Intel CPU pushed total system consumption to 388 watts, the 1950X hit 358 watts, an 8% reduction for what was often betwixt 20 - 30% more performance.